| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ambert5
Joined: 15 Nov 2012
Posts: 10
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:04 pm Post subject: Microsoft WebMatrix 2 |
 |
|
It's easy to use, yet has a monstrous amount of functionality crammed into its nicely unified UI and manages to provide plenty of help (almost) without becoming intrusive. As a web development all-rounder WebMatrix 2 is little short of a triumph.
Since beta release MS has been busy building in support for the kind of technology that the kids are crazy about these days. Consequently, WebMatrix 2 is one of the nicest places to play around with Node.js, it has a massive warehouse full of off-the-shelf projects such as Joomla, DotNetNuke and so on, and supplies all the necessaries for a simple .NET project, should that be your cup of tea.
This being a Microsoft scheme, it would have to have a few quirks of use, for instance a slightly over-zealous code hinting system – but overall it's excellent. And it's free!
_________________
quickbooks hosting |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
babynancy543
Joined: 15 Dec 2012
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Its a wrong notion that C# is more efficient than VB. Basic difference is C# language construct is based on c or c++(use of curly braces and functions etc). VB language construct is based on BASIC(old age computer language with no braces, they use procedures). Microsoft provides these two languages(C# and VB) to give flexibility to developers. If any developer is more comfortable with VB syntax, he can develop apps using VB.Same in case of C# too. For the development process , performance is the first choice always rather than language. If c# would have been more efficient, then no body(also no company) would have adopted it.
_________________
buy facebook likes |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Free Forum
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
